Is Tim Chaddick a Calvinist?
Will Tim Chaddick stand up this morning and say the words "I'm a Calvinist."
Probably not.
If you've attended Reality LA and really listened to the messages he gives in context, I doubt there is any dispute regarding how he feels on the subject whether you want to call it Calvinism, Reformed or Monergism
But I know there are still a lot of people I know who attend Reality LA and argue with me (quite vehemently) that Chaddick is not a Calvinist.
But lets look at the evidence
First, look who Chaddick often cites. He's one of those preachers who regularly quote others including authors, scholars and other pastors. It is not uncommon for Chaddick to quote Martyn Lloyd Jones, JI Packer, John Piper, DA Carsons, Tim Keller or Charles Spurgeon. All of whom are very well known Calvinists.
Second, look at the events Reality LA has hosted. They recently hosted an event put on by Mark Driscoll, the face of resurgent Calvinism in America. In fact it was through Driscoll's Facebook Page that I found Tim Chaddick and Reality LA as a church. And Chaddick hopes to host an event with DA Carsons in the fall.
Finally, look at what Chaddick says about himself. He says he's a compatibilist. Well there is no such thing as an Arminian Compatibilist. On October 11th of last year, Chaddick said that the bible taught two things; Total Depravity and Common Grace. Those are both pretty Calvinist doctrine.
On Octboer 11th of last year, Chaddick said, "Some of you are waiting for me to open up the Soteriology can as it were and that can will be opened in chapter 9." Well Chapter 9 is here and last week he said that God's promises transcend human expectation, exertion and selection. That sounds pretty Calvinist to me. Hopefully today he will get all the way there.


7 comments:
Hi there. I'm not sure why you're so insanely obsessed with whether or not Tim is a Calvinist. Compatibilism and Calvinism are not the same thing. Even if Tim was a Calvinist, why is it so important that he admits it to his congregation and online listeners? It's about following Jesus not calvinism.
Hi There (Anonymous);
I'm really glad you left this comment. I'd love to clear a few things up.
First, I love Reality LA and I love Tim Chaddick's preaching. It has really helped me in a lot of areas. A few weeks ago his sermon was on Christian grief. Afterwards, a friend of mine came up to me and asked me why a Calvinist should ever grieve since everything is God's will. It’s not the first time a conversation like that was started. My response was if you want to know what I believe, listen to Tim Chaddick because he is a Calvinist. My friend was rather upset by this response because he insisted Tim Chaddick wasn't a Calvinist. That's primarily why I wrote the post.
Second, if you can tell me what the difference is between Compatibilism and Calvinism I would love to know. I feel that when people believe there is a difference it’s because they believe all Calvinism is Hyper-Calvinism or that Compatibilism is in between Calvinism and Arminianism. Both are false premises.
Third, I was struggling with my faith for a long time. I stopped going to church, stopped reading my bible, stopped praying. I still believed in God I just hated Him. I was told by some Christians that based on Hebrews 6 (having fallen away) that I could never be a Christian again. I struggled with my faith because I didn't understand the Gospel. I had no framework by which to comprehend pain, suffering, why Christians weren't better people, why some did not become Christians. I found those answers in Tim Chaddick and in Calvinism.
I think it’s important for a pastor of a congregation to be forthright about what they are teaching. Because if you walk away from Reality LA believing Tim Chaddick is teaching free will exists or that a person can lose his salvation then obviously something is being lost in the message.
Finally, I believe Calvinism is the Gospel message of Jesus; God's sovereignty, the need for grace, the futility of works. It's the best framework by which to understand the process of salvation. A lot of people preach in the name of Jesus but they preach false things; Jesus wants you to be rich (Osteen), Jesus wants you to be healed (Bill Johnson), Jesus wants you to live your dream (Erwin McManus), Jesus wasn't born of a virgin birth (Rob Bell). All those people claim to be following Jesus but what about Jesus are they following? I believe Calvinism provides the best framework to follow Jesus.
Sorry if anything I've written offends you. But I’m glad that you care enough to leave a response. I'd love to talk to you more about it. I assume you must go to Reality LA. Would you like to grab a cup of coffee sometime? Let me know because I really am interested in discussing this and getting any misconceptions out of the way.
Good write-up, Mike.
Hi there.. I know little about Calvinism, but does it not teach that God completely "ordained" or chose those who would follow him -- that is, there is no actual "choice" in it for humans, he either chose us or did not?
I do not believe this is what Tim Chaddick teaches. Looking back on his sermon on Romans 9, he expressed God's sovereignty and man's responsibility are completely compatible... that is, God will give man over to the desires of man's heart... it is man's choice (and there is always a choice) of what he will choose.
Do you disagree -- because you say "..if you walk away from Reality LA believing Tim Chaddick is teaching free will exists...then obviously something is being lost in the message."
Do you attend Reality regularly?
Great comments. About "free will" -
I've heard it explained thus: if we think of free will as 'the ability to do anything we want, whenever we want, however we want' we can truly ascribe that to God.
Human freedom is constrained by our created purpose, on the other hand.
Good distinction? I love this discussion of Calvinism.
That's a fine write up you did on your own personal journey regarding Calvinism. I very much relate as its similar to my journey. I actually found this blog after googling Chaddick, Bell, & Piper's names because I was curious if Tim has discussed the latest debate between the two.
Question: I am passionate about all three of your focuses in this blog. Its a brilliant concept! However I don't claim to be a Republican or Democrat. I do follow politics closely but my convictions tell me to never claim to be either conservative or liberal but seek truth above all. I agree and disagree with stances both parties take. So my question is why only have the elephant up top? Is this a Conservative, Republican leaning blog?
Dear Anonymous;
I am a professional republican political operative. GOP politics is what I do for a living. So yes, this is a conservative/republican leaning blog.
Just as it is a calvinist leaning blog.
Just as it is a no designated hitter leaning blog
I write about who I am
Post a Comment